“The Animals We Use,” Revised
As anyone who writes and edits knows, it's far easier to produce a longer powerful, thorough piece than a shorter one.
I intentionally deleted the entire section on the environment, I'm not dealing with the health benefits of not using animals, and meanwhile I wanted to present a logical progression of comments and questions that, for its perspective, was thorough. And all while remaining accurate with verbiage.
Thanks for the comments and suggestions. I did change some language as there were places were clarification was needed. But the essence is the same. Thorough is a tough concept, and I can't say I succeeded, but here's my best short(er) version.
I give you: the revised Thinking Critically About The Animals We Use.