Skip to content

The F-Word

Now that I’ve tackled The C-Word, it’s time to move on down the road to F. Here’s the chain of events:

  • Earlier this week I referred to Gary Francione’s interview on Vegan Freak Radio from late last year. It’s a love fest, they agree with one another, and all is right with the world.
  • Erik Marcus of Vegan.com has commented about parts of the interview on his podcast, and I was definitely not feeling the love. (Naturally, I believe everyone should listen to both segments and judge for themselves.)

The main source of angst in Marcus’ commentary is that he believes "the burden of proof is on Professor Francione" to show that welfare "victories" won’t lead to abolition.

Because I have a doctorate in Applied Linguistics, I’m particularly curious about the way humans use language, especially when they are debating. We humans tend to be quite proud of our language skills, and in fact often point to them as what separates us from other animals. Meanwhile, our language is often the thing that gets in the way of our communication.

  • Marcus drops the F-bomb regarding Francione; he calls him a Fundamentalist.

I get the F-bomb a lot, and I don’t consider it an insult at all–it’s simply an observation. Fundamentalism is the strict adherence to principles. A vegan, by definition, is a fundamentalist in that she is aligning her behavior with her beliefs. All it means is that consistency is present, and hypocrisy is absent. That’s it; end of story. But Marcus clearly uses it as a derogatory term. After all, who are the most famous fundamentalists on the planet right now? The religious fundamentalists of Al Qaeda who want us (Americans, among others) dead.

If you react like the word is an insult, it’s an insult. But if you clarify what it means, you put the other person on the defense, and they must scramble for a new word to describe you. Don’t let anyone else set the rules (the language) of a debate without clarifying any remotely objectionable term.

2 Comments Post a comment
  1. M Holmes #

    I think that Erik Marcus is right that the animal rights movement should be trying to ban practices like veal crates and battery cages. How could anyone who cares about animals oppose such obviously good improvements? Banning battery cages may not be the end goal, but it's certainly better than letting the birds who are being used today suffer more than they need to.

    February 10, 2007
  2. martyn rule #

    hello
    many thanks for your website… I am a fellow animal activist and NLP qualified linguistics fan … I have been wondering how to affect the meta programs of activists me included to get the bigger picture to inform the actions and vice versa…
    .My background is in the Creative Arts and libertarian personal growth and community …Your website is fascinating ..I am currently assisting at PETa here in Norfolk so look forward to researching beliefs and possibilities ..a favourite movie is KPAX with Kevin Spacey that covers issues of Liberation /consciousness and a plant-based conscious life.
    Thanks for your site
    Martyn Rule

    February 13, 2007

Leave a Reply

You may use basic HTML in your comments. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS